Even as the continued rise of passive management threatens the vast majority of asset managers, fundsters worry about a potentially bigger threat: tech titans.
Bloomberg renews the longtime fear,
going back at least
seven years, that technology giants like
Alphabet,
Amazon,
Apple,
Facebook, and
Microsoft might try to build or buy their way into asset management or wealth management. Indeed, electronic payments specialist
Paypal is already
helping a roboadvisor scale up its distribution, and two years ago there were rumors that messaging specialist
Snapchat would
build its own roboadvisor.
| Bill Doyle Fidelity Labs Head of Research | |
"We're working to innovate so we don't get caught flat-footed,"
Bill Doyle head of research at
Fidelity Labs (part of Fidelity Investments), tells
Bloomberg.
The bad news for fundsters is that many tech giants have powerful retail brands and direct connections with consumers that they could use for distribution, advantages that very few asset managers have. And while the investment world hasn't quite regained much of the public's trust since 2008, many people (especially millennials) trust tech companies. The
Bloomberg piece cites
Capgemini SE research that more than 50 percent of investors with at least $1 million in assets would turn to a big tech company to manage that wealth, as well as
Viacom research that three-quarters of millennials would prefer money management from tech giants over services offered by their own banks.
On the flip side, there continue to be good reasons why tech giants haven't taken asset management just yet. The big one, in the U.S. at least, is that financial services may be the most heavily regulated business sector (ok, defense is probably tougher), a significant barrier to entry to any players outside the industry.
There are other lines of defense, too. The importance of human financial advisors in working with investors is critical, and one might expect those advisors to be less eager than their clients to jump on a tech giant's asset management gamble. And that combines with another issue, scale: as more and more dollars flow to passive products, and fees continue to compress across the board, asset management does not offer the same enticing margins that it once did, especially for any firm looking to be a giant player with its own infrastructure.
On the flip side, if any tech titans do get interested in the asset management or wealth management businesses, that may provide opportunity, too. After all, those branding and distribution advantages could be melded with an established or rising player's own industry expertise, scale, and familiarity with regulations. Perhaps it's time for fundsters and their allies to consider forging alliances with the folks in Silicon Valley ... 
Edited by:
Neil Anderson, Managing Editor
Stay ahead of the news ... Sign up for our email alerts now
CLICK HERE