The MFWire
Manage Email Alerts | Sponsorships | About MFWire | Who We Are

Subscribe to MFWire.com's News Alerts [click]

Rating:The New Face of the SEC Not Rated 4.0 Email Routing List Email & Route  Print Print
Friday, October 01, 2004

The New Face of the SEC

Reported by Theresa Sim

Is the SEC taking a new tack? In an unprecedented action announced yesterday, regulators are holding a chain of command responsible for one broker's fraudulent actions.

Regulators allege that Dennis Herula, a Raymond James Financial broker, is guilty of fraud, but they don't stop there; regulators are holding the broker's former branch manager David Ullom, and Raymond James' former president and chief operating officer, J. Stephen Putnam, responsible for failing to properly supervise Herula.

Raymond James officials were quick to respond to the SEC's charges: "[b]elieving this to be an unwarranted expansion of a brokerage firm's responsibility, we feel we have no choice but to contest these charges," stated Richard Averitt, chairman and chief executive officer of RJFS.

"[I]n the many months we have spent discussing the possible resolution of this case with the SEC staff, there was never any suggestion by them of a claim of fraud until after we advised them of our unwillingness to settle the initial allegations of inadequate supervision," officials stated.

Regulators allege that Herula and others, from November 1999 to March 2000, collected $44.5 million from unwitting investors, promising "astronomical returns." Herula deposited the money in a Raymond James account, promising the investors that they retained control of their own accounts and that they were safeguarded by Raymond James.

Herula transferred approximately $15.5 million to an account controlled by his wife or dissipated the funds.

The regulators also charge that Ullom and Putnam were aware of "red flags" related to Herula's behavior, but did not respond properly to the warnings. Ullom and Putnam were aware that Herula was using Raymond James letterhead and misrepresenting himself in activities related to a business venture, allege regulators.

More generally, regulators criticized Raymond James' policy of allowing representatives to work from home or off-site, but failing to supervise or audit off-site representatives' work. Raymond James also failed, during that period, to audit branch office accounts.  

Stay ahead of the news ... Sign up for our email alerts now

 Do You Recommend This Story?

Return to Top
 News Archives
2020: Q1
2019: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2018: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2017: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2016: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2015: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2014: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2013: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2012: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2011: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2010: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2009: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2008: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2007: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2006: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2005: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2004: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2003: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2002: Q4Q3Q2Q1
 Subscribe via RSS:
Add to My Yahoo!
follow us in feedly

©All rights reserved to InvestmentWires, Inc. 1997-2020
14 Wall Street | 20th Floor | New York, NY 10005 | P: 212-331-8968 | F: 212-331-8998
Privacy Policy :: Terms of Use