Quantcast
The MFWire
Manage Email Alerts | Sponsorships | About MFWire | Who We Are

Subscribe to MFWire.com's News Alerts [click]

Rating:Buying Fund Firms Doesn't Cost What It Used To Not Rated 0.0 Email Routing List Email & Route  Print Print
Thursday, October 15, 2015

Buying Fund Firms Doesn't Cost What It Used To

News summary by MFWire's editors

Once upon a time, in boom times of yore, the growth of publicly-traded mutual fund shops' shares outpaced the growth of the overall market. Now the worm has turned.

David Randall
Thomson Reuters
Regional Sales Consultant
David Randall and Chuck Mikolajczak of Reuters contrast the bull markets of the 1990s and the early 2000s with the one that began in 2009 and note that many asset managers are now cheap, both when compared to their historical PE ratios and when compared to the current PE ratio of the S&P 500. The wire service points to the rise of passive investing and the increase in 401(k) withdrawals as two factors hurting asset managers' valuations.

It's not clear if the valuation hit has spread to privately-held fund firms, too. Last week private equity shops TA Associates and Reverence Capital Partners unveiled a $1.15-billion deal to buy Russell Investments, a more than 33-percent drop from the previously rumored leading bid. That price translates into just 0.42 percent of Russell's AUM, a low ratio as fund firms go, though Russell is a manager-of-managers.

On the flip side, this summer TA was on the opposite side of a deal that valued First Eagle at 4.0 percent of its AUM, which is on the high end for such deals.

What else might be driving fund firms' valuation shift? Perhaps investors have become more wary of how market-driven fund firms' prospects are. Costs don't shift too much as AUM rises and falls, and AUM is heavily influenced by the markets ... so the looming prospect of a big drop can make any fund firm look a lot less profitable in the longer term. Meanwhile, distributors on multiple fronts have woken up to their power and have started pushing back against fund firms' historically higher margins, even as they shrink their fund menus. It's hard out here for a fundster. 

Edited by: Neil Anderson, Managing Editor


Stay ahead of the news ... Sign up for our email alerts now
CLICK HERE

0.0
 Do You Recommend This Story?



GO TO: MFWire
Return to Top
 News Archives
2020: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2019: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2018: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2017: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2016: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2015: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2014: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2013: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2012: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2011: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2010: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2009: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2008: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2007: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2006: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2005: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2004: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2003: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2002: Q4Q3Q2Q1
 Subscribe via RSS:
Raw XML
Add to My Yahoo!
follow us in feedly




©All rights reserved to InvestmentWires, Inc. 1997-2020
14 Wall Street | 20th Floor | New York, NY 10005 | P: 212-331-8968 | F: 212-331-8998
Privacy Policy :: Terms of Use