Quantcast
The MFWire
Manage Email Alerts | Sponsorships | About MFWire | Who We Are

Subscribe to MFWire.com's News Alerts [click]

Rating:BlackRock and the ICI: Ready to Compromise on Money Funds? Not Rated 0.0 Email Routing List Email & Route  Print Print
Friday, September 28, 2012

BlackRock and the ICI: Ready to Compromise on Money Funds?

Reported by Chris Cumming

The ICI has staunchly opposed Mary Schapiro's proposals to reform money funds, and took a leading role in the lobbying efforts that helped block reforms. So it's no surprise that ICI president Paul Schott Stevens has penned a missive in opposition to FSOP chairman Tim Geithner's attempt to force the SEC to adopt Schapiro's plan.

Stevens' letter to the members of the FSOC states that Schapiro's proposals "have elicited strong opposition for their adverse impacts on investors issuers and the economy," earning "hundreds" of opponents.

In what may qualify in the regulatory-letter-writing community as a zinger, Stevens says that he hopes regulators "will take an objective, fact-based view of the issues" — as opposed, presumably, to the view Geithner and Schapiro have taken.

Yet Stevens' comment also strikes a conciliatory note, saying that the ICI will "continue to present empirical analysis to inform the regulatory debate" as the SEC "continues its engagement on money fund issues, seeking to determine if future reforms are necessary and, if so, what shape those reforms should take."

On the same note, today BlackRock issued a statement with an attached proposal of its own that suggest a willingness to compromise with Washington.

Saying that it has "actively pursuing a number of potential solutions to MMF reform over the past three years" and is committed to "preserve money market funds while addressing the concerns of regulators," the firm released a "ViewPoint" paper with its own proposal to reform the funds.

The BlackRock paper endorses the idea of "circuit breakers" — similar to the "gates" that Geithner proposed yesterday — to prevent MMF runs. The paper also signals a softer line toward Schapiro's proposal for MMFs to adopt floating NAVs, saying that research suggests that this would "change but not destroy the industry."

Meanwhile, as the FSOC meets today in a closed-door session, Bloomberg further clarifies where all these statements are likely to lead: a eventual compromise between fund firms and the regulators. 

Stay ahead of the news ... Sign up for our email alerts now
CLICK HERE

0.0
 Do You Recommend This Story?



GO TO: MFWire
Return to Top
 News Archives
2024: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2023: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2022: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2021: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2020: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2019: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2018: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2017: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2016: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2015: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2014: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2013: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2012: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2011: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2010: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2009: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2008: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2007: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2006: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2005: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2004: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2003: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2002: Q4Q3Q2Q1
 Subscribe via RSS:
Raw XML
Add to My Yahoo!
follow us in feedly




©All rights reserved to InvestmentWires, Inc. 1997-2024
14 Wall Street | 20th Floor | New York, NY 10005 | P: 212-331-8968 | F: 212-331-8998
Privacy Policy :: Terms of Use