The MFWire
Manage Email Alerts | Sponsorships | About MFWire | Who We Are

Subscribe to MFWire.com's News Alerts [click]

Rating:S&P Parent Sues Vanguard Not Rated 3.0 Email Routing List Email & Route  Print Print
Thursday, June 08, 2000

S&P Parent Sues Vanguard

Reported by Paul Braverman

The Vanguard and the Standard and Poor's names have been inextricably linked for years. Now, those names have been joined on legal papers. McGraw-Hill, S&P's parent company, has filed a lawsuit against Vanguard in Manhattan federal court, alleging that Vanguard's new exchange-traded funds, the Vipers, use the S&P indices and name without permission.

Details about the suit are sketchy, and neither side is talking. The dispute centers around the licensing agreement between S&P and Vanguard, which permits Vanguard to track S&P indices and use the S&P name, e.g., the Vanguard S&P 500 Index fund.

Related Links
 Standard & Poor's
On InvestmentWires
 The Ratings Game
May 17 2000
 Bogle Speaks Out
May 16 2000
 Vanguard Gets in the Game
May 12 2000
Vanguard has recently been taking the necessary steps to launch the Vipers, including seeking SEC approval. Vanguard's plans call for some of the Vipers to track S&P indices and use the S&P name. Apparently, the parties have not entered into a separate licensing agreement to cover the Vipers.

S&P claims that Vipers are qualitatively different from Vanguard's other funds, that they're not covered by any licensing agreement, and that as a result, Vanguard is using the name and indices without permission and without payment.

Although it hasn't yet responded to the lawsuit, Vanguard presumably claims that the existing agreement is broad enough to cover the Vipers, and that no separate agreement is necessary.

Conversations with the firms produced the expected results. "We have no comment," said a Vanguard spokesman. "I'm really not at liberty to talk about it," added an S&P official. As part of the lawsuit, S&P has asked the court to order Vanguard to withdraw its SEC application for the Vipers, as well as other relief and damages.


This afternoon, Vanguard issued a response to the lawsuit. Not surprisingly, the firm called the lawsuit "baseless and without merit," and said that it intends to "vigorously defend against this action."

Vipers aren't new funds, but "represent interests in the same funds already covered by S&P licenses," reads the statement. "The exchange traded shares represent merely a different form of distributing shares of our existing funds," said Greg Barton, managing director and general counsel for Vanguard, in the statement.  

Stay ahead of the news ... Sign up for our email alerts now

 Do You Recommend This Story?

Return to Top
 News Archives
2020: Q3Q2Q1
2019: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2018: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2017: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2016: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2015: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2014: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2013: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2012: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2011: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2010: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2009: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2008: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2007: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2006: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2005: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2004: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2003: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2002: Q4Q3Q2Q1
 Subscribe via RSS:
Add to My Yahoo!
follow us in feedly

©All rights reserved to InvestmentWires, Inc. 1997-2020
14 Wall Street | 20th Floor | New York, NY 10005 | P: 212-331-8968 | F: 212-331-8998
Privacy Policy :: Terms of Use