Quantcast
The MFWire
Manage Email Alerts | Sponsorships | About MFWire | Who We Are

Subscribe to MFWire.com's News Alerts [click]

Rating:Fund Tracker Shakes Up Ratings Not Rated 0.0 Email Routing List Email & Route  Print Print
Monday, April 22, 2002

BY THE NUMBERS
Fund Tracker Shakes Up Ratings

by: Sean Hanna, Editor in Chief

Morningstar is taking the wraps off a new ratings system that is likely to shake up the current list of winners and losers. The new ratings will no longer pit all stock funds against each other. It will also reward funds that hold down losses, even at the expense of overall performance.

As the majority of net sales follow highly rated funds, the revamp in the ratings system could have a large impact on the sales of fund groups. Before the rise of the Web, Morningstar ratings were thought to account for up to 90 percent of fund flows.

Fund firm executives interviewed by MFWire.com said that though they were aware of the changes in the ratings, they were not yet certain how their funds would be affected.

"Morningstar stayed in touch with us through the process," said one executive.

The Chicago fund-tracker is making the changes to reflect the way investors now purchase funds, said Don Phillips, Morningstar managing director. He explained that most investors no longer own just one or two funds and that they are looker for funds that fit a specialized role in a portfolio.

The new ratings ensure "that a high rating results from superior performance, not a 'tail wind' effect caused by the outperformance of a particular area of the market," explained Phillips.

The new ratings are less likely than the old ratings to reward funds for spikes in performance or from being in a hot asset class. In periods like the NASDAQ run up from 1998 to 2000, the new system would likely have favored steadier, diversified funds more than the old system did.

The changes to the system are set to go into effect in July and the first ratings will be based on data gathered from June 30, 2002.

Rather than assigning star ratings within four broad asset class categories, funds will be sized up within 50 more narrowly defined groups. That means that funds in a hot asset class (think small cap value today) will no longer rank better than funds in a cold objective (think aggressive growth). Instead, only the top funds within each objective will receive top ratings.

The new ratings will use the same scale of one to five stars assigned on a bell-curve. They will also be load-adjusted. The new star rating uses an enhanced risk-adjusted return measure and accounts for all variations in a fund's month-to-month performance, with more emphasis on downward risk.

The enhanced risk-adjusted return measure is based on "expected utility theory," explained Morningstar, which recognizes that investors are a) more concerned about a possible poor outcome than an unexpectedly good outcome and b) willing to give up some portion of their expected return in exchange for greater certainty of return.

The firm will also de-emphasize historic ratings of funds that switch objectives. Morningstar officials explained that the change was made to keep fund firms from having an incentive to change the fund objective to gain a better rating.  

See the list of all the 2002 Most Influential People



Stay ahead of the news ... Sign up for our email alerts now
CLICK HERE

0.0
 Do You Recommend This Story?



GO TO: MFWire
Return to Top
 News Archives
2025: Q3Q2Q1
2024: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2023: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2022: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2021: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2020: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2019: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2018: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2017: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2016: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2015: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2014: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2013: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2012: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2011: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2010: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2009: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2008: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2007: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2006: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2005: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2004: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2003: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2002: Q4Q3Q2Q1
 Subscribe via RSS:
Raw XML
Add to My Yahoo!
follow us in feedly


    Sorry, no records in the database matched your search parameters. Clich back and try again.



  1. Nicsa webinar - New research by Alex Edmans and the Diversity Project - The Power of diverse thinking: How the best teams make decisions, July 1
  2. MFDF Director Discussion Series - Open Forum, July 9
  3. MFDF webinar - Mid-Year Tax Update for Registered Investment Companies, July 10
  4. MFDF Director Discussion Series - Open Forum (Philadelphia), July 15
  5. 2025 MMI Women in Advisory Solutions Forum, Jul 15-16
  6. Nicsa webinar - How Trusted GenAI is Transforming Data Access in Asset Management, July 16
  7. MFDF webinar - M&A and Consolidation in Asset Management, July 16
  8. MFDF webinar - ETF Conversions, July 17
  9. MFDF Director Discussion Series - Open Forum (New York), July 22
  10. MFDF Ask Anything webinar - AI Edition, July 24
  11. MFDF webinar - Use of Derivatives by RICs, July 29
  12. MFDF Director Discussion Series - Open Forum (Columbus, Ohio), August 20
  13. Samfund Soiree Boston 2025, August 21
  14. MFDF webinar - The Audit Committee Chair's Guide to Balancing Duties and Emerging Issues, September 3
  15. ICI ETF Conference, Sep 8-10
  16. Nicsa webinar - Reimagining Reconciliation: AI, Regulation, and Capital Markets Transformation, September 10
  17. MFDF webinar - Series Trust Funds - Compliance and Board Reporting, September 10
  18. MFDF In Focus - Board Oversight of DEI in Current Landscape, September 11
  19. MFDF webinar - MFDF 15(c) White Paper Webinar Series: Part 4 – Enforcement Action Takeaways, September 16
  20. MFDF webinar - Latest in Closed-End Funds Litigations, September 23
  21. MFDF webinar - Fixed Income Insights: Navigating Market Trends & Opportunities, September 24
  22. MFDF webinar - Risk Management Essentials for RICs and Boards, September 29
  23. MFDF webinar - Diligent - Tools for Fund Board Book, October 1
  24. 10th annual Fuse Forum, October 8
  25. MFDF webinar - Essential Strategies in Board Oversight of Operational Risk Management, October 14
  26. 2025 MMI Annual Conference, Oct 15-17




©All rights reserved to InvestmentWires, Inc. 1997-2025
14 Wall Street | 20th Floor | New York, NY 10005 | P: 212-331-8968 | F: 212-331-8998
Privacy Policy :: Terms of Use