just lost a patent lawsuit. On Wednesday Newkirk
revealed that a federal jury ruled in Newkirk's favor in a suit (filed November 30, 2006) where NewRiver claimed that Newkirk's EDGAR-View
service infringed on NewRiver's ProspectusExpress
"Naturally, we're very pleased with the outcome," stated Newkirk general counsel James Salada
. "We were fortunate to have a thoughtful jury that carefully considered all the issues."
A spokesman for NewRiver could not immediately be reached for comment.
In February, Mobular Technologies
settled a similar case with NewRiver involving Mobular's mobileCompliance
product (see MFWire, 2/23/2009
Newkirk, an Albany, New York-based communications provider that does significant work in the defined contribution marketplace, was represented by Albany law firm Heslin, Rothenberg, Farley & Mesiti
Company Press Release
ALBANY, NY, April 8, 2009 — A Boston Federal District Court jury yesterday rejected NewRiver’s patent infringement lawsuit against Newkirk. NewRiver had contended that Newkirk’s EDGAR-View® service infringed a NewRiver patent that serves as the basis for NewRiver’s ProspectusExpress® service. The jury disagreed. The jury found that
many of the claims contained in the NewRiver patent were invalid and that Newkirk had not infringed any remaining valid claims.
The jury also rejected NewRiver’s position that Newkirk had breached an earlier contract
between the two companies when Newkirk developed and sold its EDGAR-View service.
“Naturally, we’re very pleased with the outcome,” said James Salada, Newkirk’s general
counsel. “We thought all along that there wasn’t much to NewRiver’s case. Still, with a
jury trial, anything’s possible. We were fortunate to have a thoughtful jury that carefully
considered all of the issues.” Newkirk was represented in the case by Heslin, Rothenberg,
Farley & Mesiti, P.C., of Albany, New York.
Newkirk anticipates a NewRiver appeal. “But appealing carries some risk for NewRiver,” noted Salada. “A recent Federal Circuit decision, In re Bilski, casts considerable uncertainty on business method patents like NewRiver’s. If there’s an appeal, we expect to cross-appeal and bring that question before the court. The result could be a finding that the entire NewRiver patent is invalid.”
Newkirk had previously petitioned the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for a reexamination of the validity of the NewRiver patent, and the Patent Office subsequently issued an initial office action that declared all of the NewRiver patent claims invalid. That determination is being challenged by NewRiver within the Patent Office.
For more information on Newkirk’s defined contribution services and products, including
EDGAR-View, contact Newkirk at 800-525-4237 (Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Eastern Time) or visit www.newkirk.com.
Newkirk and its subsidiary companies are leading-edge defined contribution plan
communication providers. For over 30 years, Newkirk has developed creative solutions
to communication issues faced by financial institutions and professional firms focusing
on 401(k), 457, 403(b), money purchase, and profit sharing plans. For more information,
visit www.newkirk.com or call 800-525-4237.
Stay ahead of the news ... Sign up for our email alerts now