The MFWire
Manage Email Alerts | Sponsorships | About MFWire | Who We Are

Subscribe to MFWire.com's News Alerts [click]

Rating:WSJ Sees One Executive Comp Debate Divide Funds Not Rated 0.0 Email Routing List Email & Route  Print Print
Thursday, September 11, 2008

WSJ Sees One Executive Comp Debate Divide Funds

by: Neil Anderson, Managing Editor

Thursday's Fund Track column (login required) puts a dent in the assertion that mutual fund managers vote all their proxy shareholder votes as a single voice, siding with boards of directors and management. The Wall Street Journal's Sam Mamudi shines a light on the case of J.C. Penney, where a dispute over a failed limit on executive severance split fund managers, with Bill Miller's Legg Mason Value Trust and the Vanguard 500 Index Fund putting their votes on the side of J.C. Penney's board while Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity and Neuberger Berman Partners Portfolio voted against the board. (The four funds held about $200 million, $83 million, $90 million and $69 million in J.C. Penney, respectively, according to Mamudi.) Here, at least, the institutional money was not unanimous.

Yet since the SEC mandated disclosure of funds' proxy votes starting in 2003, the issue has mostly captured the press' attention because of alleged uniformity in fund managers' votes (see The MFWire, May 22, 2007). 

Stay ahead of the news ... Sign up for our email alerts now

 Do You Recommend This Story?

Return to Top
 News Archives
2020: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2019: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2018: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2017: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2016: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2015: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2014: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2013: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2012: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2011: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2010: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2009: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2008: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2007: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2006: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2005: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2004: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2003: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2002: Q4Q3Q2Q1
 Subscribe via RSS:
Add to My Yahoo!
follow us in feedly

©All rights reserved to InvestmentWires, Inc. 1997-2020
14 Wall Street | 20th Floor | New York, NY 10005 | P: 212-331-8968 | F: 212-331-8998
Privacy Policy :: Terms of Use