The MFWire
Manage Email Alerts | Sponsorships | About MFWire | Who We Are

Subscribe to MFWire.com's News Alerts [click]

Rating:Princeton Slow on the Uptake? Not Rated 0.0 Email Routing List Email & Route  Print Print
Thursday, February 02, 2006

Princeton Slow on the Uptake?

by: Sean Hanna, Editor in Chief

This week's announcement by Merrill Lynch that it is renaming its mutual fund advisory group to Princeton Portfolio Research and Management (no more MLIM or Mercury) has caught the attention of the lawyers at Princeton University. Merrill's move shouldn't have surprised them, but it appears it did.

The New York Times reported Thursday that the university has asked Merrill to not use the name.

"It now appears that Merrill is planning to exploit the university's name and reputation for its commercial gain," Cass Cliatt, a spokesperon for Princeton University told the paper in response to questions about the issue. "We don't want Princeton to be associated with the performance of Merrill's funds."

It seems, Ms. Cliatt and her associates at Princeton U. have little faith in Merrill's fund management abilities.

Perhaps, they have more faith in Merrill's capabilities as a retirement plan administrator, which would explain why their was no similar hubbub when Merrill took the Princeton name for the Amvescap Retirement business it acquired last May.

Princeton's lawyers did not just miss the Merrill press releaase, they have also missed out on the Google revolution. A quick search reveals that Merrill has created separate branding of the new group for use with its plan sponsor clientele (see this conference listing and scroll up to see a separate entry for Merrill Lynch).

At the time of the Amvescap deal, Merrill officials said that they adopted The Princeton Retirement Group name and brand because it "will carry neutral branding to complement the distribution, product and client service requirements of each institution served."

That explanation sounds similar to the reasons Merrill took the Princeton name for its fund advisory arm.

Somehow, though, Merrill's move in the 401(k) business passed by Princeton U.'s legal team without notice while the fund move hit them square between the eyes -- which just goes to show that even in academia distribution gets less respect than product. 

Stay ahead of the news ... Sign up for our email alerts now

 Do You Recommend This Story?

Return to Top
 News Archives
2023: Q1
2022: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2021: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2020: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2019: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2018: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2017: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2016: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2015: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2014: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2013: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2012: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2011: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2010: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2009: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2008: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2007: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2006: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2005: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2004: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2003: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2002: Q4Q3Q2Q1
 Subscribe via RSS:
Add to My Yahoo!
follow us in feedly

©All rights reserved to InvestmentWires, Inc. 1997-2023
14 Wall Street | 20th Floor | New York, NY 10005 | P: 212-331-8968 | F: 212-331-8998
Privacy Policy :: Terms of Use