The MFWire
Manage Email Alerts | Sponsorships | About MFWire | Who We Are

Subscribe to MFWire.com's News Alerts [click]

Rating:Principal Fund: Getting a C Is Not So Bad Not Rated 0.0 Email Routing List Email & Route  Print Print
Thursday, February 20, 2014

Principal Fund: Getting a C Is Not So Bad

News summary by MFWire's editors

Getting a C on your overall grade? If this happened in your freshman-year Sociology class you'd be freaking out now. But, if you are Principal Financial Group and are given an overall rating C for your Morningstar Stewardship Grade, you can relax a little. 

In the Morningstar ratings universe, getting a C on overall performance is really not that terrible. The Morningstar Stewardship Grade methodology considers four components when grading firms, including corporate culture, manager incentives, fees, regulatory history, and board quality (U.S. fund firms only).  

Sneaking into the top 20 fund family rankings for assets, the 100-plus-years-old firm has expanded boldly in the past decade. It has bought some quality investment shops, seen some good performance and kept its nose clean with regulators. It has also grown more open to using subadvisors. Its days of being solely an insurance-retirement business are clearly over.

So what does it mean if you get a C for your Morningstar Stewardship Grade? According to Morningstar's revised methodology (in use since 2011), firms with standard cooperate cultures, 40 percent to 59 percent of assets in funds with manager investment exceeding $1 million, average fee rank percentiles from 41 to 60, no history in regulatory violations, standard fund boards governance, get a C. 

According to the 2011 Mutual Fund Stewardship Grade Research Paper the most common grade among all funds is C. In that paper, 455 out of 1051 funds received a C, or about 43 percent.

With all these being said, receiving a C really just means that Principal fund is not a standout, but there is nothing that investors should be extremely worried about. Maybe it's time for investors to learn to be a little less judgmental.  

Edited by: Ning Zhou

Stay ahead of the news ... Sign up for our email alerts now

 Do You Recommend This Story?

Return to Top
 News Archives
2023: Q1
2022: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2021: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2020: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2019: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2018: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2017: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2016: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2015: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2014: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2013: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2012: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2011: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2010: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2009: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2008: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2007: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2006: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2005: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2004: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2003: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2002: Q4Q3Q2Q1
 Subscribe via RSS:
Add to My Yahoo!
follow us in feedly

©All rights reserved to InvestmentWires, Inc. 1997-2023
14 Wall Street | 20th Floor | New York, NY 10005 | P: 212-331-8968 | F: 212-331-8998
Privacy Policy :: Terms of Use