The MFWire
Manage Email Alerts | Sponsorships | About MFWire | Who We Are

Subscribe to MFWire.com's News Alerts [click]

Rating:SEC Smites UBS Over MBS Pricing in Mutual Funds Not Rated 0.0 Email Routing List Email & Route  Print Print
Tuesday, January 17, 2012

SEC Smites UBS Over MBS Pricing in Mutual Funds

Reported by Neil Anderson, Managing Editor

Almost four years after the fact, fallout from the collapse of the housing market has landed a mutual fund firm in hot water with the Securities and Exchange Commission. UBS Global Asset Management just agreed to shell out $300,000 to settle SEC charges that UBS mis-priced tranches of mortgage-backed securities inside three UBS mutual funds for two weeks in June 2008.

The settlement also includes censure and a cease-and-desist order from violating two sections of the Investment Company Act. UBS neither admitted nor denied the charges.

"UBS Global Asset Management is pleased to have resolved this issue with the SEC," UBS spokeswoman Karina Byrne wrote in an e-mailed statement to The MFWire.com.

"During the two-week period concerned in June 2008, the firm relied on pricing data from independent third parties, rather than the purchase price, to value a group of mortgage-backed securities purchased by a small number of the firm's US-registered mutual funds. The impact on those funds was minimal. As a matter of course, the firm regularly reviews its procedures in an effort to ensure its valuations and pricing are as accurate as possible," Bryne added.

The charges and settlement stem from "approximately 54 complex fixed-income securities" UBS bought in June 2008 for $22 million for the three mutual funds, according to the SEC. The commission claims that "all but six of the securities were then valued at prices substantially in excess of the transaction prices, including many at least 100 percent higher." That, the SEC found, bumped the NAVs of the three mutual funds up by one to ten cents per share "for several days in June 2008."

Neither the SEC nor UBS revealed which three UBS mutual funds were affected.

Press Release

Washington, D.C., Jan. 17, 2012 Ė The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged an investment advisory arm of UBS with failing to properly price securities in three mutual funds that it managed, resulting in a misstatement to investors of the net asset values (NAVs) of those funds.† The misconduct was revealed during the course of an SEC examination, minimizing investor harm. †

† The SECís Enforcement Division began investigating UBS Global Asset Management (UBSGAM) following a referral from SEC examiners who conducted a routine exam of the firm, which is an SEC-registered investment adviser.† The SECís investigation further determined that during a two-week period, UBSGAM did not follow the mutual fundsí fair valuation procedures in pricing certain illiquid fixed-income securities in the portfolios of the mutual funds. †

† UBSGAM agreed to pay $300,000 to settle the SECís charges. †

† ďUBS Global Asset Management failed to fulfill one of its core delegated responsibilities on behalf of mutual funds it advises Ė to price securities in the mutual funds accurately,Ē said Merri Jo Gillette, Regional Director of the SECís Chicago Regional Office.† ďFortunately this misconduct was brought to light quickly, so the duration was short and the harm to investors minimal.Ē †

† According to the SECís order instituting administrative proceedings against UBSGAM, the firm purchased on behalf of the mutual funds approximately 54 complex fixed-income securities in June 2008 at an aggregate purchase price of approximately $22 million.† Most of the securities were part of subordinated tranches of nonagency mortgage-backed securities whose underlying collateral generally consisted of mortgages that did not conform to the requirements necessary for inclusion in mortgage-backed securities guaranteed or issued by Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae, or Freddie Mac.† The securities purchased also included asset-backed securities and collateralized debt obligations. †

† The SECís order finds that following the purchases, all but six of the securities were then valued at prices substantially in excess of the transaction prices, including many at least 100 percent higher.† The valuations used by UBSGAM were provided by pricing sources (broker-dealers or a third-party pricing service) that did not appear to take into account the prices at which the mutual funds had purchased the securities.† Some of the broker-dealer quotations were based on the previous month-end pricing; other quotes were stale and not priced daily.† UBSGAM did not price the securities at fair value until it held a meeting of the firmís Global Valuation Committee more than two weeks after UBSGAM began receiving ďprice tolerance reportsĒ identifying the discrepancies between the purchase prices and the valuation of the securities based on the pricing sources.† By using the valuations provided by broker-dealers or a third-party pricing service instead of the transaction prices, UBSGAM caused the mutual funds to not follow their own written valuation procedures.† These procedures required the securities to be valued at the transaction price until UBSGAM received a response to a price challenge based on the discrepancy identified in the price tolerance report, or UBSGAM made a fair value determination.† The procedures provided that the transaction price could be used for up to five business days until a decision needed to be made to determine the fair value.† By failing to implement these procedures, UBSGAM aided and abetted and caused the funds to violate Rule 38a-1 under the Investment Company Act. †

† The SECís order further finds that because the securities were not properly or timely priced at fair value, the NAVs of the funds were misstated between one cent and 10 cents per share for several days in June 2008.† Consequently, the mutual funds sold, purchased, and redeemed their shares based on inaccurately high NAVs on those days.† UBSGAM thus aided and abetted and caused the funds to violate Rule 22c-1 adopted pursuant to Section 22(c) of the Investment Company Act.† †

† In settling the charges without admitting or denying the SECís findings, UBSGAM agreed to be censured and to pay a $300,000 penalty, and also consented to a cease-and- desist order from committing or causing violations of Rules 22c-1 and 38a-1 under the Investment Company Act.† The SEC acknowledges the assistance and cooperation of UBSGAM during the examination and investigation. †

The SECís investigation was conducted by Jamie Davidson, Marlene Key, Steven Levine, and Eric Phillips of the Chicago Regional Office.† The SEC examination team that referred the matter to enforcement officials included Maureen Dempsey, Matthew Harris, Leora Hughes, Stanton Nelson, and Susan Weis of the Chicago Regional Office. 

Stay ahead of the news ... Sign up for our email alerts now

 Do You Recommend This Story?

Return to Top
 News Archives
2019: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2018: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2017: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2016: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2015: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2014: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2013: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2012: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2011: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2010: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2009: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2008: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2007: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2006: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2005: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2004: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2003: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2002: Q4Q3Q2Q1
 Subscribe via RSS:
Add to My Yahoo!
follow us in feedly

©All rights reserved to InvestmentWires, Inc. 1997-2019
14 Wall Street | 20th Floor | New York, NY 10005 | P: 212-331-8968 | F: 212-331-8998
Privacy Policy :: Terms of Use