The MFWire
Manage Email Alerts | Sponsorships | About MFWire | Who We Are

Subscribe to MFWire.com's News Alerts [click]

Rating:Bad Funds Should Give Up, Says Morningstar Not Rated 3.0 Email Routing List Email & Route  Print Print
Monday, May 20, 2002

Bad Funds Should Give Up, Says Morningstar

by: Sean Hanna, Editor in Chief

Morningstar officials are hoping that the fund-tracker's new rating system will encourage fund firms to shutter the dogs of their line-ups more quickly. The revelation was made by Don Phillips, managing director at the Chicago firm in an interview with the Boston Globe.

Phillips also said fund investors and fund managers have built different expectations about the role of funds. Many investors, says Phillips, still look at their fund managers as strategic asset allocators, yet managers see themselves as stock pickers within an asset class.

"I talked to a lot of investors who during the bull market said, 'If we get a bear market, I certainly hope my manager is smart enough to go to cash.' Yet I had talked to their manager the week before and he was saying, 'My job is to stay fully invested in stocks at all time.' Managers were assuming that the buyer had made the decision to buy the fund because they wanted stock exposure."

Phillips also told the paper that fund companies have inverted the intent of the Forty Act. Rather than putting shareholders on top and considering themselves as employees or stewards, fund firms are taking a marketing approach to the industry. Said Phillips:

"The major thing would be to get this notion of trusteeship back into the industry, the idea that the fund shareholder is the owner. The [Investment Company Act of 1940] goes out of its way to put the investor at the top of the pyramid, as the owner, with the fund management company as the employee."

"Fund companies have inverted that to say, 'We'll create a product and sell it through supermarkets or other distribution networks to customers.' That structure sort of puts the investor at the bottom of the pyramid, where they are at a disadvantage."

See the list of all the 2002 Most Influential People

Stay ahead of the news ... Sign up for our email alerts now

 Do You Recommend This Story?

Return to Top
 News Archives
2021: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2020: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2019: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2018: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2017: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2016: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2015: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2014: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2013: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2012: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2011: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2010: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2009: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2008: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2007: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2006: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2005: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2004: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2003: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2002: Q4Q3Q2Q1
 Subscribe via RSS:
Add to My Yahoo!
follow us in feedly

©All rights reserved to InvestmentWires, Inc. 1997-2021
14 Wall Street | 20th Floor | New York, NY 10005 | P: 212-331-8968 | F: 212-331-8998
Privacy Policy :: Terms of Use