The MFWire
Manage Email Alerts | Sponsorships | About MFWire | Who We Are

Subscribe to MFWire.com's News Alerts [click]

Rating:American Funds Rings in the New Year With a Victory in Court Not Rated 0.0 Email Routing List Email & Route  Print Print
Monday, January 4, 2010

American Funds Rings in the New Year With a Victory in Court

News summary by MFWire's editors

Mutual fund industry insiders can rest a little easier in the new year, as Capital Group is about to beat back a lawsuit over its use of 12b-1 fees. On December 28, United States District Court Judge Gary Feess ruled that In re American Mutual Funds Fee Litigation, first filed in July 2004 as Nicholas J Corbi et al v The Capital Group Companies Inc et al, "must be dismissed and judgment entered for CRMC [Capital Research and Management Company, advisor to the American Funds] and AFD [American Funds Distributors, Cap Group's distributor B-D]." The judge asked American Funds to file a "proposed judgment consistent with these findings and conclusions" by Friday, January 8.

Maura Griffin, a spokeswoman for Capital Group, told The MFWire that the fund firm is "pleased with the ruling."

"We were especially pleased that the court said that the unaffiliated directors were diligent in their responsibilities," Griffin said, "and that the fees were not disproportionate to the services rendered."

Yet the judge tempered his ruling with some harsh words for Capital Group.

"That conclusion should not be mistaken for a determination that the directors obtained the best possible deal for investors ... Although Defendants proposed certain findings that included what amounted to a commmendation for the work of the directors, they will have to be satisfied with merely winning the lawsuit," Feess wrote. "The Court finds little in the record to establish a potent incentive on the part of the directors ... to police the compensation paid to CRMC to manage the funds."

Feess also seems to express sympathy with the plaintiffs and even suggests that, because of the high legal standard set for attacking mutual fund firms over fees, "a defendant's success in litigation, where the availability of a better bargain is considered insufficient to prove a breach of fiduciary duty, proves little about the conduct of the unaffiliated directors."

Milberg and Weiss & Lurie serve as the plaintiffs' attorneys in this suit. Another law firm, Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman and Herz, also filed two other similar suits against Capital Group in July 2009. 

Correction: A previous version of this story misidentified the law firm for the plaintiffs in this suit. Attorneys from Milberg and from Weiss & Lurie represent the plaintiffs.

Edited by: Neil Anderson, Managing Editor

Stay ahead of the news ... Sign up for our email alerts now

 Do You Recommend This Story?

Return to Top
 News Archives
2024: Q3Q2Q1
2023: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2022: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2021: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2020: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2019: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2018: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2017: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2016: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2015: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2014: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2013: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2012: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2011: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2010: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2009: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2008: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2007: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2006: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2005: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2004: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2003: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2002: Q4Q3Q2Q1
 Subscribe via RSS:
Add to My Yahoo!
follow us in feedly

©All rights reserved to InvestmentWires, Inc. 1997-2024
14 Wall Street | 20th Floor | New York, NY 10005 | P: 212-331-8968 | F: 212-331-8998
Privacy Policy :: Terms of Use