The MFWire
Manage Email Alerts | Sponsorships | About MFWire | Who We Are

Subscribe to MFWire.com's News Alerts [click]

Rating:Ameriprise Sub Fined Over Directed Brokerage Not Rated 4.0 Email Routing List Email & Route  Print Print
Thursday, July 12, 2007

Ameriprise Sub Fined Over Directed Brokerage

Reported by InvestmentWires Staff, 

The NASD has slapped a fine of $375,000 on Securities America for improperly sharing directed brokerage commissions from a mutual fund company with a former broker, Michael Bullock, according to a news release on Wednesday. The regulator likewise found that Omaha, Nebraska-based Securities America, Ameriprise's brokerage arm, failed to take steps to ensure that Bullock disclosed his additional compensation to his union-sponsored retirement plan clients.

NASD officials did not name the fund company in the press release, but the Los Angeles Times identified the fund firm as MFS.

Officials at the NASD described the case as the first of its kind.

Unlike other directed brokerage cases the NASD has pursued in the past, officials said this case is unique in that the mutual fund company directed brokerage specifically for the benefit of an individual broker.

Securities America settled without admitting nor denying the allegations.

Im a separate complaint, the NASD charged Bullock with improperly receiving directed brokerage commissions and other compensation of more than $280,000.

According to the NASD, Bullock entered into an arrangement with the mutual fund company to have thousands of dollars of brokerage commissions directed to him every month, which he then used to hire a sales assistant to help him find new retirement plan clients. The NASD said the arrangement was approved by Securities America and from 2002 through 2003, the brokerage firm received $420,000 in directed commissions from the fund company for Bullock's benefit. Securities America paid Bullock $262,500 and retained $157,500.

Bullock periodically advised his retirement plan clients to select or maintain the fund company's mutual funds, but didn't disclose that he was getting additional compensation from that company, the NASD found in its investigation.

All but one of Bullock's retirement plan clients had at least one mutual fund from that mutual fund company in their plans.

"In this case, Securities America approved Bullock's improper arrangement to receive directed brokerage commissions from mutual fund company portfolio transactions while advising his retirement plan clients to invest in this same mutual fund company's securities," said James S. Shorris, NASD executive vice president and head of enforcement.

"This violation of NASD's rules governing mutual fund compensation, when coupled with the failure to disclose to the firm's clients the terms of his financial arrangement, made for an intolerable situation," he said. 

Stay ahead of the news ... Sign up for our email alerts now

 Do You Recommend This Story?

Return to Top
 News Archives
2020: Q1
2019: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2018: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2017: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2016: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2015: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2014: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2013: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2012: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2011: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2010: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2009: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2008: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2007: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2006: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2005: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2004: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2003: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2002: Q4Q3Q2Q1
 Subscribe via RSS:
Add to My Yahoo!
follow us in feedly

©All rights reserved to InvestmentWires, Inc. 1997-2020
14 Wall Street | 20th Floor | New York, NY 10005 | P: 212-331-8968 | F: 212-331-8998
Privacy Policy :: Terms of Use