MutualFundWire.com
   The insiders' edge for 40 Act industry executives!
an InvestmentWires' Publication |
Tuesday, March 15, 2016 Pimco, BlackRock, and Janus vs ... Everybody Else? Mutual fund flow reporting, it turns out, is not the same everywhere you look. BlackRock, Janus, and Pimco [profile] do it one way; DoubleLine [profile], Fidelity, J.P. Morgan, Legg Mason, Vanguard, plus Bloomberg, Morningstar, and the ICI, all do it another way.
If this debate sounds like deja vu all over again to you, it might be. In January 2016 Pimco reported net inflows for December 2015 thanks to counting reinvestments. Yet at the time Bloomberg and others noted that without reinvestments, the fund wouldn't have net outflows. The new Bloomberg pieces frame the debate in the context of Pimco's tumultuous several years, notably the last year and a half after the dramatic exit of founder Bill Gross. And Bloomberg also argues that such flow reporting discrepancies make it difficult for investors to compare flows and to understand how their funds are faring. Left unmentioned in both pieces is another discussion, about the differences between monthly fund flow estimates (like the ones from Morningstar and Bloomberg) and actual monthly fund flow numbers (released by fund firms). DoubleLine has been one of the loudest voices pointing out this distinction and its importance, particularly over short time frames. (Meanwhile, the broader multi-year Morningstar-DoubleLine feud seems to have cooled off.) Printed from: MFWire.com/story.asp?s=53642 Copyright 2016, InvestmentWires, Inc. All Rights Reserved |