Quantcast
The MFWire
Manage Email Alerts | Sponsorships | About MFWire | Who We Are

Subscribe to MFWire.com's News Alerts [click]

Rating:SEC Smites Morgan Keegan Fund Directors Not Rated 0.0 Email Routing List Email & Route  Print Print
Monday, December 10, 2012

SEC Smites Morgan Keegan Fund Directors

Reported by Tommy Fernandez

The SEC is going after directors of the Regions Morgan Keegan mutual funds. The regulatory agency filed charges against eight former members of the boards of directors overseeing five Memphis, Tenn.-based mutual funds for violating their asset pricing responsibilities under the federal securities laws.

The eight fund directors named in today’s SEC enforcement action are:

  • J. Kenneth Alderman of Birmingham, Ala.
  • Jack R. Blair of Germantown, Tenn.
  • Albert C. Johnson of Hoover, Ala.
  • James Stillman R. McFadden of Germantown
  • Allen B. Morgan Jr. of Memphis
  • W. Randall Pittman of Birmingham
  • Mary S. Stone of Birmingham
  • Archie W. Willis III of Memphis


    According to the SEC’s order, the directors’ failure to fulfill their fair value-related obligations was particularly inexcusable given that fair-valued securities made up the majority of the funds’ net asset values – in most cases more than 60 percent. The mutual funds involved were the RMK High Income Fund, RMK Multi-Sector High Income Fund, RMK Strategic Income Fund, RMK Advantage Income Fund, and Morgan Keegan Select Fund.

    The SEC claims that the funds, which were invested in some securities backed by subprime mortgages, fraudulently overstated the value of their securities as the housing market was on the brink of financial crisis in 2007. The SEC and other regulators previously charged the funds’ managers with fraud, and the firms later agreed to pay $200 million to settle the charges.

    According to the SEC, fund directors — under federal securities laws — are responsible for determining the fair value of fund securities for which market quotations are not readily available. According to the SEC’s order instituting administrative proceedings against the eight directors, they delegated their fair valuation responsibility to a valuation committee without providing meaningful substantive guidance on how fair valuation determinations should be made. The fund directors then, according to the SEC made no meaningful effort to learn how fair values were being determined. The order further claims that the directors received only limited information about the factors involved with the funds’ fair value determinations, and obtained almost no information explaining why particular fair values were assigned to portfolio securities.

    Regions shelled out $210 million in 2011 to settle the original claims involving the funds.

    Attorney Jeffrey Maletta, a partner at K & L Gates representing Blair, Johnson, McFadden, Pittman, Stone, and Willis, issued the following statement:
    STATEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE FORMER INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS OF THE REGIONS MORGAN KEEGAN FUNDS

    The former independent directors of the Regions Morgan Keegan Funds emphatically deny the allegations against them in the SEC administrative proceeding filed today. They intend to contest this case vigorously, and they are confident that they will ultimately be vindicated.

    More than 5 years after the events concerned, the SEC staff now seeks to pursue administrative charges against a group of independent directors alleging that they unintentionally caused regulatory violations related to portfolio valuation. However, the SEC has chosen to ignore a host of facts and circumstances which demonstrate that these directors at all times acted diligently and in good faith during the unprecedented market turmoil of 2007. For example, the SEC complaint fails to note that the SEC itself specifically determined in its 2011 enforcement case against Morgan Asset Management that these same directors were defrauded by fund management, who concealed improper valuation practices from them.1 Apparently, the SEC now seeks to punish the victims of this fraudulent activity. Moreover, at the very time in 2007 that the SEC contends these directors should have known that valuation procedures were deficient, the directors were advised by experienced independent auditors from a major accounting firm that the funds’ valuation procedures were reasonable and appropriate, and that the process was working properly and producing correct fair valuations. Similar assurances were received from the funds’ Chief Compliance Officer, and a 2005 SEC staff exam had produced no adverse comments on the fair valuation procedure or process. The current SEC action rejects the ability of directors to take any comfort from such experts or from the absence of any “red flags” concerning the fair valuation process.

    The SEC action can only be explained as a misguided attempt to retroactively regulate by enforcement in an area in which the SEC has been unwilling or unable to provide meaningful guidance through the normal regulatory process. Fair valuation has been described as a “notoriously gray area” by the SEC staff,2 and a senior SEC staff member recently admitted that the SEC has for years “tabled” efforts to issue a comprehensive interpretative release providing guidance in this area.3 Nevertheless, the SEC now has decided to use enforcement proceedings to make new rules, and “send a message” to mutual fund boards, by holding these independent directors to standards not applicable at the time and, in any event, based on allegations not supported by the actual facts and circumstances.

    MFWire could not immediately reach the other directors for comment. Raymond James declined comment.

    Here is the press release from the SEC regarding the charges:


    SEC Press Release

    SEC CHARGES EIGHT MUTUAL FUND DIRECTORS FOR FAILURE TO PROPERLY OVERSEE ASSET VALUATION

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 2012-259

    SEC CHARGES EIGHT MUTUAL FUND DIRECTORS FOR FAILURE TO PROPERLY OVERSEE ASSET VALUATION

    Washington, D.C., Dec. 10, 2012 – The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced charges against eight former members of the boards of directors overseeing five Memphis, Tenn.-based mutual funds for violating their asset pricing responsibilities under the federal securities laws.

    The funds, which were invested in some securities backed by subprime mortgages, fraudulently overstated the value of their securities as the housing market was on the brink of financial crisis in 2007. The SEC and other regulators previously charged the funds’ managers with fraud, and the firms later agreed to pay $200 million to settle the charges.

    Under the securities laws, fund directors are responsible for determining the fair value of fund securities for which market quotations are not readily available. According to the SEC’s order instituting administrative proceedings against the eight directors, they delegated their fair valuation responsibility to a valuation committee without providing meaningful substantive guidance on how fair valuation determinations should be made. The fund directors then made no meaningful effort to learn how fair values were being determined. They received only limited information about the factors involved with the funds’ fair value determinations, and obtained almost no information explaining why particular fair values were assigned to portfolio securities.

    “Investors rely on board members to establish an accurate process for valuing their mutual fund investments. Otherwise, they are left in the dark about the value of their investments and handicapped in their ability to make informed decisions,” said Robert Khuzami, Director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement. “Had the board not abdicated its responsibilities, investors may have stood a better chance of preserving their hard-earned nest assets.”

    The SEC Enforcement Division’s Asset Management Unit continues to prioritize asset valuation investigations, with recent enforcement actions including charges against three top executives at New York-based KCAP Financial and two executives at former $1 billion hedge fund advisory firm Yorkville Advisors LLC.

    The eight fund directors named in today’s SEC enforcement action are:

  • J. Kenneth Alderman of Birmingham, Ala.
  • Jack R. Blair of Germantown, Tenn.
  • Albert C. Johnson of Hoover, Ala.
  • James Stillman R. McFadden of Germantown
  • Allen B. Morgan Jr. of Memphis
  • W. Randall Pittman of Birmingham
  • Mary S. Stone of Birmingham
  • Archie W. Willis III of Memphis


    According to the SEC’s order, the eight directors’ failure to fulfill their fair value-related obligations was particularly inexcusable given that fair-valued securities made up the majority of the funds’ net asset values – in most cases more than 60 percent. The mutual funds involved were the RMK High Income Fund, RMK Multi-Sector High Income Fund, RMK Strategic Income Fund, RMK Advantage Income Fund, and Morgan Keegan Select Fund.

    The SEC Enforcement Division alleges that the directors caused the funds to violate the federal securities laws by failing to adopt and implement meaningful fair valuation methodologies and procedures and failing to maintain internal control over financial reporting. For example, the funds’ valuation procedures did not include any mechanism for identifying and reviewing fair-valued securities whose prices remained unchanged for weeks, months, and even entire quarters.

    “While it is understood that fund directors typically assign others the daily task of calculating the fair value of each security in a fund’s portfolio, at a minimum they must determine the method, understand the process, and continuously evaluate the appropriateness of the method used,” said William Hicks, Associate Regional Director of the SEC’s Atlanta Regional Office.

    According to the SEC’s order, the funds’ valuation procedures required that the directors be given explanatory notes for the fair values assigned to securities. However, no such notes were ever provided to the directors, and they never followed up to request such notes or any other specific information about the basis for the assigned fair values. In fact, Morgan Keegan’s Fund Accounting unit, which assigned values to the securities, did not utilize reasonable procedures and often allowed the portfolio manager to arbitrarily set values. As a result, the net asset values of the funds were materially misstated in 2007 from at least March 31 to August 9. Consequently, the prices at which one open-end fund sold, redeemed, and repurchased its shares were inaccurate. Furthermore, other reports and at least one registration statement filed by the funds with the SEC contained net asset values that were materially misstated.

    The SEC’s order alleges that the fund directors caused the funds’ violations of Rules 22c-1, 30a-3(a) and 38a-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

    The SEC’s investigation was conducted by members of the SEC’s Atlanta Regional Office and the Asset Management Unit.
  •  

    Stay ahead of the news ... Sign up for our email alerts now
    CLICK HERE

  • 0.0
     Do You Recommend This Story?



    GO TO: MFWire
    Return to Top
     News Archives
    2024: Q2Q1
    2023: Q4Q3Q2Q1
    2022: Q4Q3Q2Q1
    2021: Q4Q3Q2Q1
    2020: Q4Q3Q2Q1
    2019: Q4Q3Q2Q1
    2018: Q4Q3Q2Q1
    2017: Q4Q3Q2Q1
    2016: Q4Q3Q2Q1
    2015: Q4Q3Q2Q1
    2014: Q4Q3Q2Q1
    2013: Q4Q3Q2Q1
    2012: Q4Q3Q2Q1
    2011: Q4Q3Q2Q1
    2010: Q4Q3Q2Q1
    2009: Q4Q3Q2Q1
    2008: Q4Q3Q2Q1
    2007: Q4Q3Q2Q1
    2006: Q4Q3Q2Q1
    2005: Q4Q3Q2Q1
    2004: Q4Q3Q2Q1
    2003: Q4Q3Q2Q1
    2002: Q4Q3Q2Q1
     Subscribe via RSS:
    Raw XML
    Add to My Yahoo!
    follow us in feedly




    ©All rights reserved to InvestmentWires, Inc. 1997-2024
    14 Wall Street | 20th Floor | New York, NY 10005 | P: 212-331-8968 | F: 212-331-8998
    Privacy Policy :: Terms of Use