Quantcast
The MFWire
Manage Email Alerts | Sponsorships | About MFWire | Who We Are

Subscribe to MFWire.com's News Alerts [click]

Rating:A Trade Pub Disses Mutual Fund Ratings Not Rated 0.0 Email Routing List Email & Route  Print Print
Monday, December 03, 2012

A Trade Pub Disses Mutual Fund Ratings

News summary by MFWire's editors

Performance-based ratings like the Morningstar star system have a lousy track record predicting future investing success, according to guest writer Gordon Tewell in P & I.

Unfortunately, Tewell writes, these rating systems tend to be imperfect when it comes to predicting future performance. The basis of most rating systems is some combination of past performance typically over three-, five- or 10-years and a measure of the fund's risk. The problem with using purely quantitative rating systems is that the information used for each manager is historical.

Moreover, according to Tewell, these ratings often fail over market cycles and top-quartile mutual funds often lag benchmarks.

To read more of Tewell's critique of the philosophy of past performance, turn to P&I

Edited by: Tommy Fernandez


Stay ahead of the news ... Sign up for our email alerts now
CLICK HERE

0.0
 Do You Recommend This Story?



GO TO: MFWire
Return to Top
 News Archives
2018: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2017: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2016: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2015: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2014: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2013: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2012: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2011: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2010: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2009: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2008: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2007: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2006: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2005: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2004: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2003: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2002: Q4Q3Q2Q1
 Subscribe via RSS:
Raw XML
Add to My Yahoo!
follow us in feedly




©All rights reserved to InvestmentWires, Inc. 1997-2018
14 Wall Street | 20th Floor | New York, NY 10005 | P: 212-331-8968 | F: 212-331-8998
Privacy Policy :: Terms of Use