Quantcast
The MFWire
Manage Email Alerts | Sponsorships | About MFWire | Who We Are

Subscribe to MFWire.com's News Alerts [click]

Rating:M* Says Fidelity Flounders Not Rated 0.0 Email Routing List Email & Route  Print Print
Monday, September 10, 2012

M* Says Fidelity Flounders

News summary by MFWire's editors

Fidelity [profile] may have fared decently overall with the 80 funds rated by the Morningstar Analyst Rating, with just over half garnering positive ratings of Bronze or better. But pitted against its largest competitors like American Funds, T. Rowe Price and Vanguard, alas, Fidelity pales in comparison.

To begin with, none of the competition were given Negative ratings in their lineups, while four of Fidelity's funds were given the knock down, Christopher Davis points out for Morningstar today. Also note that 27 of 35 American funds, 44 of 53 T. Rowe funds, and a whopping 74 of 80 Vanguard funds reaped positive ratings.

Fidelity has its strengths. Reasonable pricing and highly seasoned, tightly knit teams bolstered Fidelity's bond funds, all 13 of which earned Gold ratings. Meanwhile, two fixed-income products earned Silver ratings, a feat attributed to a number of up-and-coming analysts.

But note that most of Fidelity's bond operation functions relatively autonomously, with separate offices in Merrimack, New Hampshire. This "has helped [Fidelity] insulate them from the cultural faults that hurt the equity funds' ratings," Davis writes.

This is evident in the fact that, while stock funds enjoy many of the same advantages as fixed-income, they have grown too big, Davis writes. This compromises their ability to successfully implement their strategies. One example Davis gives is how Growth Company's Steve Wymer has had to own a significant potion of outstanding shares in mid- and small caps in his portfolio, limiting his ability to move in and out of stocks with ease.

Meanwhile, in the case of Bill Bower, the success of Diversified International has been almost entirely based on Bower's success between 2001 and 2005. Lack of confidence in management's process has also hurt some funds' ratings.  

Edited by: Irene Park


Stay ahead of the news ... Sign up for our email alerts now
CLICK HERE

0.0
 Do You Recommend This Story?



GO TO: MFWire
Return to Top
 News Archives
2018: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2017: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2016: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2015: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2014: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2013: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2012: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2011: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2010: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2009: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2008: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2007: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2006: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2005: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2004: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2003: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2002: Q4Q3Q2Q1
 Subscribe via RSS:
Raw XML
Add to My Yahoo!
follow us in feedly




©All rights reserved to InvestmentWires, Inc. 1997-2018
14 Wall Street | 20th Floor | New York, NY 10005 | P: 212-331-8968 | F: 212-331-8998
Privacy Policy :: Terms of Use