Quantcast
The MFWire
Manage Email Alerts | Sponsorships | About MFWire | Who We Are

Subscribe to MFWire.com's News Alerts [click]

Rating:Is a Canadian Fund Feud a Sign of Things to Come? Not Rated 5.0 Email Routing List Email & Route  Print Print
Thursday, September 17, 2009

Is a Canadian Fund Feud a Sign of Things to Come?

News summary by MFWire's editors

An on-going feud between the Canadian mutual fund industry and provincial governments escalated on Tuesday. The Ontario government has taken the offensive in the current tête-à-tête over a proposed harmonization of taxes on mutual funds in Ontario and British Columbia.

Fund executives have been especially vocal in their complaints against the new taxes, saying they will cost investors millions in extra fees. The managers' vocality has upset the Ontario government, who've now threatened to publicly release a document on the negative impact of management fees for investors if fundsters keep complaining.

There are currently no taxes on mutual funds in any province, and the proposed "harmonized tax would mean an extra 8 per cent on management fees in Ontario and 7 per cent in British Columbia," the Globe and Mail reported. According to Canadian finance minister Dwight Duncan, the taxes will make businesses more competitive, as well as make fees more transparent for investors.

“If we learned anything a year ago with the closing of Lehman Brothers, when issues of this nature aren't clear and transparent, problems happen,” Duncan told the Globe and Mail.

Although there should be no direct effects on the American mutual fund industry, the issue of fees strikes close to home as American fundsters await the Supreme Court's take on the Oakmark Funds fee suits.

Additionally, the U.S. government has made moves towards fee regulation themselves with three newly formed sub-committees devoted to examining "the needs of investors when they purchase specific products (mutual funds, hedge funds, money market funds) and services (brokerage, investment advisory, and financial planning).” The new committees include the investor as purchaser subcommittee, the investor as shareholder subcommittee and an investor education subcommittee.

While both governments claim to be trying to help investors, fund companies in the neighboring nations don't like the purposed actions. Third parties have rushed to the aid of Oakmark in the forms of petitions to the Supreme Court, and Canadian firms are surely planning their next move.

“They [the Ontario government] are nickel and diming people who are saving for their retirement," Lisa MacLeod, revenue critic for the Ontario Progressive Conservatives, told the Globe and Mail. "It's the wrong signal to send in tough economic times.” 

Edited by: Daniel Tovrov


Stay ahead of the news ... Sign up for our email alerts now
CLICK HERE

5.0
 Do You Recommend This Story?



GO TO: MFWire
Return to Top
 News Archives
2024: Q2Q1
2023: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2022: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2021: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2020: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2019: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2018: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2017: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2016: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2015: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2014: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2013: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2012: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2011: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2010: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2009: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2008: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2007: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2006: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2005: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2004: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2003: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2002: Q4Q3Q2Q1
 Subscribe via RSS:
Raw XML
Add to My Yahoo!
follow us in feedly




©All rights reserved to InvestmentWires, Inc. 1997-2024
14 Wall Street | 20th Floor | New York, NY 10005 | P: 212-331-8968 | F: 212-331-8998
Privacy Policy :: Terms of Use