The MFWire
Manage Email Alerts | Sponsorships | About MFWire | Who We Are

Subscribe to MFWire.com's News Alerts [click]

Rating:British Researchers Dive Into the American Bogle Debate Not Rated 0.0 Email Routing List Email & Route  Print Print
Wednesday, February 11, 2009

British Researchers Dive Into the American Bogle Debate

by: Neil Anderson, Managing Editor

The classic "active vs. passive management" debate has inevitably been revived in the midst of the economic and market downturn; now at least one British firm is jumping in to the eternal American mutual fund debate made famous by Jack Bogle. The Wall Street Journal's Eleanor Laise highlights UK-based Inalytics, an institutionally-focused (not retail) research firm that stepped into the US market in January.

Inalytics CEO Rick DiMascio throws in its two cents on the benefits and detriments of active management. His firm's research suggest the classic Bogle-ism that typical active managers don't outperform their benchmarks net of fees. DiMascio praises active managers more for their buying abilities than their selling ones and urges investors to avoid long-short funds and obsessing over track records. 

Stay ahead of the news ... Sign up for our email alerts now

 Do You Recommend This Story?

Return to Top
 News Archives
2020: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2019: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2018: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2017: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2016: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2015: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2014: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2013: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2012: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2011: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2010: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2009: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2008: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2007: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2006: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2005: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2004: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2003: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2002: Q4Q3Q2Q1
 Subscribe via RSS:
Add to My Yahoo!
follow us in feedly

©All rights reserved to InvestmentWires, Inc. 1997-2020
14 Wall Street | 20th Floor | New York, NY 10005 | P: 212-331-8968 | F: 212-331-8998
Privacy Policy :: Terms of Use